Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 16.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max is much better than Moto Z Force, getting a 94.9 score against 75.8. The iPhone 14 Pro Max design is a lot newer than Moto Z Force's, but it's just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro Max has iOS 16.x OS, and Moto Z Force comes with Android 7.0 Nougat OS.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger amount of RAM, a greater number of faster cores and a 64-bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density and a bit lower 1290 x 2796 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
IPhone 14 Pro Max shoots much better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has better video frame rates and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera. Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4323mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z Force. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Moto Z Force, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.