Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 9.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s is a bit better than the Moto Z Force, having a score of 83 against 75.8. The iPhone 6s body has the same thickness than Moto Z Force, but it's lighter. The iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x operating system, while Moto Z Force works with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. IPhone 6s features a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a lot lower 1334 x 750px resolution, a bit smaller screen and a lot less pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto Z Force counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 6s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone 6s counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with an additional GPU and a 64 bits CPU.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a larger diafragm aperture and a way more megapixels camera in the back. Moto Z Force has a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 1715mAh.
Although iPhone 6s is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 6s, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z Force, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.