Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 9.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s Plus is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having a score of 84.2 against 75.8. Apple iPhone 6s Plus comes with iOS 9.x operating system, and Motorola Moto Z Force comes with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. Despite being the best device in this review, Apple iPhone 6s Plus's construction is older, heavier and a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
IPhone 6s Plus counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, they both have a screen of the same size. Moto Z Force features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 6s Plus counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bits processing unit. Motorola Moto Z Force shoots clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with superior battery life than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 6s Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.