Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 has a general score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. Apple iPhone 7 is a somewhat lighter phone than Moto Z Force, but they are equally thin. Moto Z Force features a bit sharper display than iPhone 7, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, a bigger display and a much greater pixel number per inch in the screen.
The Moto Z Force features a greater memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone 7, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone 7 counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto Z Force has a way better battery duration than iPhone 7, because it has a 79% bigger battery capacity. Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone 7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Moto Z Force also has a way higher 21 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto Z Force, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.