Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) is just a bit better than Moto Z Force, getting an 81.5 score against 75.8. The iPhone SE (2020) is a incredibly newer and a little lighter device than Moto Z Force, although it's a bit thicker. The iPhone SE (2020) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat operating system.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better looking display than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a way greater display pixel density, a larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 2 more CPU cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a way lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE (2020), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.