Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. The iPhone X design is newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Apple iPhone X counts with a faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone X features a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Motorola Moto Z Force has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force features improved battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size. The iPhone X features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with lot less MP resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Moto Z Force, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.