Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a score of 82 against 75.8. Apple iPhone XR's design is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force. Moto Z Force counts with a little more vivid display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much greater display density.
Moto Z Force counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 2 more processing cores and a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XR has a slightly better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a lot lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Moto Z Force has just a little better battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 19 percent larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto Z Force, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.