Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is much better than Moto Z Force, having an 84.2 score against 75.8. The Apple iPhone XS is a incredibly newer cellphone than Moto Z Force, but it is a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Apple iPhone XS features a little sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a better performing processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also has a 64-bit processor and a greater number of cores. Moto Z Force counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Apple iPhone XS shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a same size camera aperture. The Moto Z Force counts with longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone XS, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.