Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone is just a bit better than Moto Z Force, having a score of 77.1 against 75.8. Asus ROG Phone's body is notably newer than Moto Z Force's, but it is heavier and thicker. Asus ROG Phone features a display that is very similar to Moto Z Force's screen, because although the Asus ROG Phone has a little worse display pixel density and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Asus ROG Phone has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Asus ROG Phone counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force features a lot better camera than Asus ROG Phone, although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, they both have the same video definition and the same diafragm aperture. Asus ROG Phone counts with a little better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Asus ROG Phone, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.