Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black glare |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having an 86.3 score against 75.8. Asus ROG Phone 3's design is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it's noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker. Asus ROG Phone 3 has a bit better looking display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a lot lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM memory.
Asus ROG Phone 3 features a way better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 71 percent larger battery size. Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a lot better video resolution and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.