Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black glare |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a overall score of 87.4 against 75.8. These devices have Android OS, but Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition is a notably newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it's thicker and much heavier.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a little sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lot worse pixels amount per inch in the display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a larger display.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much better video quality. Moto Z Force counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a really longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.