Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is a way newer cellphone than Moto Z Force, although it is heavier and way thicker.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a bit better processor than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory. Moto Z Force has a slightly better looking display than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel quantity per inch in the display.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) and Moto Z Force feature quite similar storage to install games and applications, they have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.