Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a global score of 81.1 against 75.8. These phones work with Android OS, but the Google Nexus 6 has 5.1 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although it's the best we are comparing here, it must be told that it's also an older, incredibly thicker and somewhat heavier phone.
Google Nexus 6 has a little sharper screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with a little larger display. Google Nexus 6 features a bit superior processor than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Moto Z Force features a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z Force also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The Moto Z Force counts with a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force has just a little better battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Nexus 6, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.