Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Although the Google Pixel and the Moto Z Force were released with only a few months difference, Google Pixel's construction is somewhat thicker but lighter. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560, a quite higher screen density and a little bit bigger display.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Moto Z Force captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Moto Z Force features superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel is more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.