Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. The Google Pixel 3 body is extremely newer and a bit lighter than the Moto Z Force's, but it is a bit thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a little greater pixels amount in each display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater number of faster cores. Moto Z Force counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z Force shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a way better resolution camera. Moto Z Force has greater battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.