Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than Moto Z Force, with an 82.9 score against 75.8. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is notably newer, but thicker and heavier than the Moto Z Force. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better display than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same amount of pixels per inch in the screen, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a bit higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 6% more battery size. The Moto Z Force captures slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z Force, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.