Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 82.9 against 75.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Google Pixel 4a's design is a lot newer and somewhat lighter than the Moto Z Force's, although it is somewhat thicker.
The Moto Z Force has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Motorola Moto Z Force features much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of 2200 megahertz cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force captures slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a costs more money than Moto Z Force, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.