Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is way newer than Moto Z Force, it's thicker and just a bit heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The Moto Z Force has a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a much worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.