Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a global score of 77.7 against 75.8. HTC One M9's design is a bit lighter than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's extremely thicker and was released a bit more further than a year before. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The HTC One M9 counts with a better processor than Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU, an additional graphics co-processor and a larger number of cores (but slower). HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better screen than Moto Z Force, although it has a little lower amount of pixels per screen inch, a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a bit smaller screen.
The Moto Z Force features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a lower 20 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Moto Z Force has longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the HTC One M9 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.