Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a 77 score against 75.8. HTC U Ultra is a just a little thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Force. Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Moto Z Force also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
HTC U Ultra features as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the Moto Z Force one, they have a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal storage. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U Ultra. Both of them have a Quad-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a back facing camera with way more MP. Moto Z Force features just a little better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 17 percent larger battery size.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.