Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force, having a 77.6 score against 75.8. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the HTC U11 body is a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than the Moto Z Force. HTC U11 counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force. They have the same count of pixels per display inch, an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a same size screen.
HTC U11 counts with a bit better CPU than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the HTC U11 also has a higher number of cores (and also faster). The Motorola Moto Z Force shoots a little bit better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little better battery life than HTC U11, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
HTC U11 costs a little more than Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.