Compare phones
LG G3
AT&TD850
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4.2 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2014-05-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White |
| $ 250.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G3 is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a 76.4 score against 75.8. Despite of the fact LG G3 is way older and somewhat thicker than Moto Z Force, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG G3 has the older 5.0 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The LG G3 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have 4 cpu cores, the LG G3 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The LG G3 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both have a better number of pixels per inch in the display, a screen with the same size and the same exact 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Moto Z Force shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG G3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a way higher 21 mega-pixels resolution.
The Moto Z Force counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than LG G3, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force features a bit superior battery life than LG G3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG G3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.