Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a overall score of 77 against 75.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version, providing you lots of additional features. The LG G7 Fit design is noticeably newer and a bit lighter, but a little thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force.
Moto Z Force has a little better performance than LG G7 Fit. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Quad-Core CPU. The LG G7 Fit has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a little bit higher 1440 x 3120px resolution, a just a bit more pixels per display inch and a bit larger display.
The Moto Z Force has just a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto Z Force also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Moto Z Force has more memory to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB, the Moto Z Force also has more internal storage capacity. Moto Z Force counts with a bit longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.