Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a global score of 84.3, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. These phones have Android OS, but LG G8 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat, so it offers a couple nice extra features. The LG G8 ThinQ design is notably newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it is a little heavier and somewhat thicker.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a little bit bigger display and a just a bit greater display pixel density. LG G8 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. Moto Z Force and LG G8 ThinQ count with very similar batteries. LG G8 ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a much less megapixels camera in the back and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG G8 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Moto Z Force, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.