Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. These devices work with Android operating system, but the LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. LG G8X ThinQ's design is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. LG G8X ThinQ has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG G8X ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 14% greater battery size. The LG G8X ThinQ shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is also cheaper than the Moto Z Force.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.