Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Titan gray |
| $ 250.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is much better than Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but LG K92 has the previous 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The LG K92 is a noticeably newer cellphone than Moto Z Force, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. LG K92 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more cores.
The LG K92 features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has more internal storage capacity. LG K92 features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
LG K92 has a little longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 14 percent more battery size.
LG K92 costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.