Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Holographic white |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 has a score of 76.7, which is just a bit better than Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Although the LG Stylo 6 is extremely newer than Moto Z Force, it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices have Android OS, but the LG Stylo 6 has the older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The LG Stylo 6 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has 4 more CPU cores. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto Z Force takes slightly better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a lot better video definition and a camera in the back with a way higher 21 MP resolution. The LG Stylo 6 and Motorola Moto Z Force have incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG Stylo 6 has a little longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG Stylo 6 is also cheaper, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.