Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 has a score of 78.6, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. These phones come with Android operating system, but the LG V10 has the older 5.1 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although LG V10 is better than the Moto Z Force, it must be noted that it's also an older, heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a little faster processing unit than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a larger number of cores. LG V10 counts with a little bit better screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower count of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the LG V10 also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The LG V10 counts with as much storage for games and applications as the Motorola Moto Z Force one, they have the same 64 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V10 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a camera with lot less megapixels resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Moto Z Force has just a bit better battery performance than LG V10, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V10 costs a bit more than Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.