Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting an 81.2 score against 75.8. LG V40 ThinQ's design is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
LG V40 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a just a little greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a bigger screen and a quite better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments. The LG V40 ThinQ's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z Force one, both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal storage.
Moto Z Force counts with a bit longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.