Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, with an 87.6 score against 75.8. The LG V60 ThinQ is a a lot newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it is noticeably heavier and thicker. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 GB more RAM and 4 more cpu cores. Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bigger storage for games and applications than Moto Z Force, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more internal storage. LG V60 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot higher resolution camera.
LG V60 ThinQ has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ is more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.