Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. LG Velvet's body is much newer, but a bit thicker and a bit heavier than Moto Z Force. The Moto Z Force has a slightly better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG Velvet has a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Velvet counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of faster cores and more RAM.
LG Velvet features a much better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has a much more MP camera. The LG Velvet features better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
LG Velvet costs a little more than Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.