Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. Even though LG Wing is much newer than the Moto Z Force, it is much heavier and a lot thicker. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The LG Wing counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The LG Wing counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage. LG Wing takes way better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG Wing also has faster video frame rate and a way better resolution camera in the back.
LG Wing counts with just a bit better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 14 percent more battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z Force. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto Z Force, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.