Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a score of 85.3, which is much better than Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 construction is way newer and much thinner than Moto Z Force's, although it is heavier.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a really bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1892 x 2688.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 and Motorola Moto Z Force count with very similar cameras, because although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way worse 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a much better storage to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with greater battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4449mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Force, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.