Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than Moto Z Force, having an 89.6 score against 75.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has an older 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Motorola edge's body is way newer, but incredibly thicker and heavier than the Moto Z Force.
Moto Z Force features a little sharper display than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Motorola edge has just a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Motorola edge counts with a greater camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola edge also has a back camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution. Motorola edge features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola edge features longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Motorola edge costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.