Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the previous 13 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Moto Z Force features a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM and 4 less cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a lot less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution. The Moto Z Force has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.