Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a extremely newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and a back facing camera with a much better 50 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 29 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.