Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is much newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
Moto Z Force counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster). Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a lot worse pixels amount per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rate, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a larger aperture. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.