Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is slightly better than Moto Z Force, getting a 77.6 score against 75.8. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Motorola Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat, counting with a couple additional features and improved performance. The Motorola Moto Z3 body is newer, a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Moto Z Force.
The Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per screen inch. The Motorola Moto Z3 has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a larger number of cores.
Moto Z Force and Moto Z3 both have incredibly similar memory capacity for applications and games, both have equal internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force has just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Although Motorola Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs more than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z Force, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.