Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a global score of 78.5 against 75.8. Even though Motorola One Action is newer than Motorola Moto Z Force, it's incredibly thicker and a little bit heavier. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen density and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola One Action counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Action also has a higher number of 2.2 gigahertz cores. Motorola One Action counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto Z Force takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto Z Force also has a camera with way more mega pixels. The Motorola One Action's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in Motorola Moto Z Force.
The Motorola One Action costs more than Moto Z Force, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.