Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a 79.8 score against 75.8. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola One Hyper has an older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Motorola One Hyper's body is much newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z Force.
Moto Z Force features a little bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola One Hyper counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher number of cores.
Motorola One Hyper shoots better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola One Hyper has a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola One Hyper counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Moto Z Force, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.