Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is a bit better than the Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Motorola One Vision's body is notably newer than Moto Z Force's, but it is just a little heavier and thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Moto Z Force has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola One Vision, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola One Vision has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger number of cores.
Motorola One Vision's battery life is just as good as the battery lifetime in Moto Z Force. The Motorola One Vision captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a way more megapixels camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.