Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has an overall score of 80, which is slightly better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. Motorola One Zoom's construction is noticeably newer than Moto Z Force's, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Moto Z Force counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola One Zoom has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower). The Motorola Moto Z Force features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Zoom shoots better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger aperture to capture better images in low-light situations and a camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola One Zoom features a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto Z Force, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.