Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Moto Z Force, getting a score of 87 against 75.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Motorola razr (2020) body is extremely newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than the Moto Z Force.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Moto Z Force features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Moto Z Force counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera in the back with way more MP and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with improved battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto Z Force, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.