Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Polar night |
| $ 250.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a general score of 80.5 against 75.8. Although the Nokia 8.3 5G is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it's somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Nokia 8.3 5G has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Moto Z Force counts with a little bit more storage for applications and games than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nokia 8.3 5G counts with better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Nokia 8.3 5G features a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.