Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a global score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is notably newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it is heavier and thicker. These phones have Android OS, but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of 2.2 gigahertz cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display density.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a way better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a lot more megapixels back camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates. Motorola Moto Z Force features a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with superior battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto Z Force, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.