Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a global score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Nokia 9 PureView's construction is incredibly newer, but a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Moto Z Force. Nokia 9 PureView has a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a bit more pixels per display inch, a bit higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
Moto Z Force features just a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video quality, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a back camera with a lot better resolution. Moto Z Force features a bit superior battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.