Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than Moto Z Force, with a global score of 80.8 against 75.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Nokia XR20's body is extremely newer than Moto Z Force's, although it's much thicker and much heavier.
Moto Z Force has a bit better screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Nokia XR20 features a bit superior processor than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera. Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia XR20, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Nokia XR20 features superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.