Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a 76.2 score against 75.8. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but nubia Red Magic 5S has 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Even though nubia Red Magic 5S is way newer than Moto Z Force, it's extremely thicker and a lot heavier.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little faster processor than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). The Motorola Moto Z Force features a slightly better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels amount per inch in the display.
The Moto Z Force counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S has longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Moto Z Force, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.