Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | OnePlus |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-10-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Haze blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 432.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 513 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is slightly better than OnePlus 7T Pro's general score of 75.8. The Moto Z Force design is somewhat thinner and lighter than the OnePlus 7T Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. OnePlus 7T Pro features a little faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
OnePlus 7T Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite inferior pixels count per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a bigger screen. The OnePlus 7T Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OnePlus 7T Pro also has higher video frame rate, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The Moto Z Force has a better memory capacity to install games and applications than OnePlus 7T Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OnePlus 7T Pro counts with longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4085mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z Force not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.