Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A15 5G is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, with a 77.4 score against 75.8. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy A15 5G has the older 14 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although Galaxy A15 5G is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. Moto Z Force and Galaxy A15 5G feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A15 5G has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and way lesser pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Galaxy A15 5G takes slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a back camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A15 5G features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 43 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy A15 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.